Article: Four Initiatives to Vote ''YES' On if you Live in Washington State

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Opinion: Tomorrow presents a historic chance for Washington voters to directly shape public policy in Washington State.  There are four key initiatives are on the ballot and your vote can make a big difference.  Don't be fooled by the corrupt News or misinformation from commercials paid for by big government and the MEGA rich.  The Government and MEGA Wealthy (People like BILL GATES) are working hard for you to say no on these Initiatives listed below.

These are the 🗳️ Four Initiatives to Vote ***YES*** On if you live in Washington State:

• 💡 I-2066: Allows natural gas as an energy option:

If you vote no, you will lose the option to have natural gas in your home.  New homes won't have the option of natural gas furnaces, gas stoves, gas dryers, gas instant hot water heaters, and other things like these inventions to lower your total energy cost.

Voting no on I-2066 will make electrical power cost climb even higher, because we will need to replace and/or update our electrical grid, so there is enough power to support home heating, cooling, lighting, and other electrical use.

The public needs to understand that the electrical grid is not setup for massive use of electrical power and many of parts to support the grid are not being made here in America anymore and some of these parts take many years to build.  Overloading will very likely to cause Brown and Black outs, which could damage our electrical grid.  Why do we know about the power grid and parts to run it?  Some of us use to work for the Bonneville Power Administration.

**** Voting YES **** allows your home to be able to use electricity and gas, which will reduce the cost of electric power and not put extreme pressure on just one power source.  Remember, our electrical power grid alone can't handle the power needed to heat, cool, and light every home in Washington, especially when you got electric cars that are now being connected to the grid too.  We will have Brown outs and Black outs like California, and it will damage the grid, and it will costs us more money.  By getting rid of natural gas will require us to either to build more dams, to use coal plants, and to use other types of dirty or dangerous power.  Natural gas is a clean source of energy, much cleaner than coal.

• 📉 I-2109: Repeals the capital gains excise tax:

These types of taxes hurt business and the consumer.  Don't be misled, 'This is not a rich person tax.'  In 2021 Washington State Legislature passed ESSB 5096. (RCW 82.87.) which creates a 7% tax on the sale or exchange of long-term capital assets such as stocks, bonds, business interests, or other investments and tangible assets.  According to the text of the law, this tax only applies to individuals.

Right now, if you own a home, your home is exempt from the Washington capital gains tax, but this will change in the near future.  According to the text of the law it will hurt certain retirement accounts that have any gains.  In 2023 the standard deduction is $262,000 per year per individual, married couple, or domestic partnership, which is not exactly a rich person who has their life saving invested in stocks, bonds, mutual funds (like what are in a 401K) for retirement.  Capital Gains Taxes will hurt those consumers who saved and already paid taxes on their money.

In the near future, when the legislature starts with their mission creep, if you own a home you will get hit on the sale of your home.  If you rent your home or apartment, you won't be immune to this tax either as this tax will be passed to you by those who own the home or apartment that are renting to you, making your rent even higher.  In the future, any type of gain will be taxed, its how taxes work, they start with the rich, then government will pass it on to the poor.  Your 401K's could be taxed too, if the State gets their way in the future.

VOTE ****YES**** to Repeal the Capital Gains Excise Tax, so you may keep you hard earned money and to prevent the enviable mission creep that will affect everyone in the near future, including to poor.

• 🌍 I-2117: Eliminates the Climate Commitment Act:

This is initiative is nothing but BS.  It just keeps the gas prices inflated and at higher cost to the public and adds another $0.50 a gallon to our already overpriced gas.  Other states and countries are not paying this tax and they enjoy the lower cost of living, so how do you think paying this tax will help the Climate, if no one has an invention to remove CO² for the atmosphere or no one else is participating or interested in doing the same thing as us?  We are being legally robbed and people are not thinking clearly.

We are already paying high fares to ride buses and the trains when you climb aboard, so government can't say we need the money, because the government is collect fares to support the transportation system.  Taxpayers are already paying for buses and trains through other taxes, which include property taxes, car tabs, gas tax and sales taxes that drivers, consumers, home owners, and renters already pay.  Why does government need more money.

Are you the taxpayer getting any share of this money back when people ride the train or bus?  The answer is No, you are not get any money back.  So, who is pocketing all this money from the fares?  Big Government and their lackeys are pocketing this money.  Employees of these public transportation outfits are also being paid wages greater than the average worker makes, which makes the cost of living a lot higher for those who are poor or retired and are on a fixed income.

The facts are the likelihood you will never get one of these executive jobs or high paid public jobs is zero, because they give them to their friends.  On top of this you also need to agree to their exclusion policies as being woke and agree to communist DEI mandates and principles.  Even if you don't ride the bus and/or train you still paying for these huge salaries and these dangerous communist policies and ideologies, through this new law that the Governor Jay Inslee passed, as well as the RTA tax that we that taxpayer voted against and we all have unlawfully been paying.

Voting no on I-2117 is a win-win situation for government and these woke mandates and policies, while your income goes straight into the government pockets for something you may or may not use.  When you do use the bus and train, you pay them again.  It's nothing but a scam!

Don't be stupid this November 5, 2024, ****VOTE YES on I-2117 and REPEAL the law, because you are not a shareholder.****

If the bus and train fares can't pay for the buses and the train's to operate, then this transportation should not exist.  Besides, do you really think that government can clean the air you breath?  Shit, we have some land that grows gold that we will sell cheap to you if you believe this.  Our state and city government can't' even clean up the trash on the streets and along the highway, which really affects the environment a lot more than any amount of driving you do with these high gas prices.  Understand, the government can't clean the air; they don't have a machine that wash the air or that takes CO2 out of the air.  Besides, we need CO² to survive on this planet, without it life and plants on this planet would cease to exist.

Also understand, Buses and Trains use fuel too, whether its electricity, gas, or diesel, all of them use some form of energy in order to move.  Big coal plants and oil are used in order generate power for all this electric power demand on the grid in order to make solar panels, dams, windmills, and other products that these buses and trains use besides the gas, diesel, or electricity to make them run.

On top of this, the passing of the Climate Commitment Act will put even more of a strain to generate more electric power besides the power we need to heat, cool and light our homes.  These laws are nothing but Trojan horses!

Again, LETS NOT BE STUPID, big government and the wealthy are counting on us being a LOW INFO voters for the environment!

Let's ****VOTE YES on I-2117 TO REPEAL THE LAW****

• 🏥 I-2124: Lets workers opt in/out of WA Cares.

This WA Cares Law that passed really makes no sense.  We already pay for Medicaid and Medicare.  Medicare comes out of your paycheck.  Medicaid comes out of the income tax and other state taxes.  Now the government wants us to pay again?

Ask yourself what are they doing with all of our money?  We hope you all know this, if you move from Washington state, you don't get to use this coverage in another state and you can't cash the policy out either.  If you buy your own coverage like some of us did, you can take this insurance with you to another state or even another country, you can also use it for your funeral cost, a death benefit, or even assisted living.  If you don't need it, you can also cash the policy out for money.  Pretty Cool, eh?

The likelihood of you retiring in this state and getting to us this state run program is less than 20%, because it cost too much to retire here, and Social Security don't even pay for rent not alone the cost of your utilities in this state.  So, you are not very likely to get a return on your money as you won't be living here when you retire.  How do we know this? Some of use are senior citizens.

****Vote YES on I-2124****, this will allow you to MAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE and will keep the cost down on the program because it will not be mandated, which drives costs up.  If you are poor, this allows you can CHOOSE to keep more of your take home pay or to make better choices with your money using an insurance company of your CHOICE or just to save your money for that rainy day.

🧐 Why Does This Matter:

💸 These initiatives will impact your cost of living in the State of Washington and your quality of life, and these laws will make your living cost and energy cost much higher in Washington.

⚖️ This is your chance to vote for or against key policies and laws that were made by the legislature and governor.

What You Can Do?:

• 🧠 Educate yourself on the facts before the election.
• 🔍 Find trusted sources like Peer Reviewed Politics^™ to help you make an informed decision.

VOTE YES on these four Initiatives to have your say in this rare moment for this republic!

Here are other policies we have already changed in order to benefit the public, give yourself around of applause, because you helped put these new common sense policies in place!  Remember, we did these things that you legislator and governor were not willing to do:

Here's what WeThePeople did to fix these things, these are Three 🔑 Initiatives We Already Got Passed:

• I-2081: Parental rights in education 👨‍👩‍👦
• I-2111: Prohibition of income taxes in Washington 💼
• I-2113: Restoring police pursuits 🚔

You can learn more about these initiatives and laws by clicking here.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ / Future42.org | Author(s): @TeaPartier_Al on Twitter | Date: October 01, 2022 | Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credit: 

Raskin Claims, ‘It’s A Remarkable Thing that Anybody Out There Believes that Donald Trump Won An Election and then claiming Trump had Lost By More Than 7 M Votes.’

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Opinion: Raskin is funny, not just funny looking either.  Jamie Raskin is either trying to be a convincing comedian or he is just down right lying his butt off, just like the rest of the clowns on the January 6th Committee.  How do we know this, well if you use a little logic here it will go a long way.  Lets examine Raskin claims for facts and since no one real knows what happen behind the doors of that November 2020 election, because there were many claims, there were audits, and their was fraud found, but Democrats and some RINO's' claimed there was not enough fraud to change the election.

With this all being said, if you really want to kind of know what happened, but not all the details with the lying, take a 30,000 foot view of the issue.  What I mean, take a look at Joe Biden, ask yourself of who he is, if he's liked and if he is competent.  President Joe Biden has been in politics for 47 years before being sworn in to serve as our 46th President.  You would hope Joe made some friends after 47 years in congress.  Friends of Joe, do like Joe Biden, but the people he knows also thought he shouldn't run for President, either.  Former President Obama was one of the people who thought President Biden should not run the country and Obama told President Joe Biden not to run for President in 2020.

The New York Times also reported, Obama quietly urged Biden not to run for President on August 16, 2019 and multiples times before that too. According to the Times article, the two men spoke at least a half dozen times before Mr. Biden decided to run, and Mr. Obama took pains to cast his doubts about the campaign in personal terms.  "You don’t have to do this, Joe, you really don’t," Mr. Obama told Mr. Biden earlier this year, according to a person familiar with the exchange.  Mr. Biden — who thinks he could have defeated Donald Trump four years ago—responded by telling Mr. Obama he could never forgive himself if he turned down a second shot at Mr. Trump.

According to other articles, the Times reported that in March 2019, Obama gathered Biden's top advisers, Anita Dunn and Kate Bedingfield to his Washington office.  Multiple sources confirmed to the Times that the ex-president had warned Biden's advisers to make sure that Biden doesn't "embarrass himself" or "damage his legacy."

Robert Gates, who was a former Defense Secretary of the United States wrote in his memoirs, "I think he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades,” Yet, Robert Gates did state he has respect for Joe's character and Gates stated in his memoirs that, "Joe Biden is impossible not to like," and Gates continued to say that Biden has, "been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.  See the video interview of Robert Gates below at timestamp 34:00 minutes.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Chris Hayes, Jamie Raskin - Interview - All In with Chris Hayes | Date: October 01, 2022 | Duration: 00:01:27 | Photo/Video Credit: MSNBC

Video: Fernand Amandi: ‘If the Republicans Capture Either Houses of Congress, They Are Committed to Undoing Democracy’

TRANSCRIPT:

Tiffany Cross: Yeah Brad, you made many good points but what is the prediction for that you're the resident pollster here brad, his optimism is a warranted, do you see people turning out in Georgia and delivering a victory to Abrams and Warnock Florida, Sherrod Beasley, North Carolina all throughout the country, considering that most of these communities have to leapfrog over rampant voters to do that.  Your thoughts?

Fernand Amandi: I think that’s exactly right.  Number one, we have to be mindful that the Republicans are now all in a committed effort to make voting as difficult as possible, especially if you are someone from a person of color community that be taken in the mindset, I think Tiffany, yes, we will see record midterm turnout.  I think it will be equal, if not better than what we saw in 2018, the highest midterm turnout in the last 75 years.  I think we will see again, if we are able to capture and hold on to the Senate, and maybe even hold on to the house, it’s going to be because Black voters, Hispanic voters, Asian voters, all of the voters across the spectrum of this rising majority turned out.  The truth of the matter is, deafening, if they don’t take the opportunity to vote in this election, they may not have an opportunity to vote again in a free and fair election.  Those really are the stakes.  I don’t think any of us can stress enough, if the Republicans capture either houses of Congress, they are committed to undoing democracy, they are committed to over turning whatever electoral results, quote unquote, does not go their way in 2024.  You even have people like Marco Rubio right now saying they necessarily commit to accepting the result of the 2022 elections.  This is what is at stake, this is why I think we have to focus on this issue and how these communities, according to the polls, show they are very engaged, very enthused and they

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Opinion: First thing we would like to address with Mr. Fernand Amandi is his understanding of what type of country we have.

Mr. Fernand Amandi we would like to direct your attention to the Constitution of the United States, because it tells you what type of country we have, obviously you have not read the constitution, otherwise you wouldn't be calling it a Democracy.  We would like to direct your attention to what a democracy is and why the founders of this country avoided calling the USA a Democracy.  Lets see what some dictionaries say, but remember some of the online and newer dictionaries try to redefine a Democracy into different classes.  The founders did not define a democracy in classes, they only defined as being partial or pure and by all means, none of the founders where interested in a Democracy, thus we are a Republic.

Us older folks know what a Democracy is, so no one is fooling us, and it's our job to let our children know what we are and where to look too.

Democracy: noun;

American Dictionary;

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT - A democracy is a country in which power is held by elected representatives.

The belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves
_{Definition of democracy from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge University Press;}

The belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives, or directly by the people themselves:

• The government has promised to uphold the principles of democracy.


• The early 1990's saw the spread of democracy in Eastern Europe.

• The country was celebrating its return to democracy.

• It is now a stable, well-governed democracy.

• "First, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest;"
• "Secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended."

• "In the first place, it is to be remarked that, however small the republic may be, the representatives must be raised to a certain number, in order to guard against the cabals of a few; and that, however large it may be, they must be limited to a certain number, in order to guard against the confusion of a multitude."  "Hence, the number of representatives in the two cases not being in proportion to that of the two constituents, and being proportionally greater in the small republic, it follows that, if the proportion of fit characters be not less in the large than in the small republic, the former will present a greater option, and consequently a greater probability of a fit choice."
• "In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to center in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters."

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV / Peer Reviewed Politics™ - Opinion | Author(s): Tiffany Cross, Fernand Amandi - Panel -  The Cross Connection with Tiffany Cross | Date: September 24, 2022 | Duration: 00:02:03 | Photo/Video Credit: MSNBC

Video: Mark Levin: People Holding the Levers of Power in Wash., D.C. Understand There’s a Difference Between McConnell and Trump, DeSantis

TRANSCRIPT:

Dan Bongino: You have written a number of transformative books that design the liberal movement.  I have a minute and a half.  Are you optimistic?  Can we turn this freedom train around and get it back to the station in.  Given the media is not telling the truth about where we are.  Are we condemned to failure here?  I’m genuinely concerned about that.

Mark Levin: I go back and forth.  We can’t win every election.  But we better start winning a slew of them or we are going to lose the country.  We need politicians hole focus on the culture and society.  That’s why Donald Trump was and is such a transformative individual.  That’s why Ron DeSantis is such a transformative individual.  And that’s why they are under vicious attack and assault.  The people entrenched.  The people who have all the resources and control the instrumentalities of our government, they understand the difference between a Mitch McConnell and the Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, and we have to, too, if we are going to keep our country.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Mark Levin, Dan Bongino - Interview -  Unfiltered with Dan Bongino | Date: September 11, 2022 | Duration: 00:01:29 | Photo/Video Credit: Fox News Channel (FNC)

Video: ‘Trying to Ignore Crime for Ideological Reasons Is Both Callous & Clue Less’

AVLON: “When the state legislature finally acted on criminal justice this summer, they decided to focus on semantics instead of solutions, officially replacing the term ‘inmate’ with ‘incarcerated person’ in state laws.  Seriously, that’s what they did.  Now, sometimes we forget that public safety is a fundamental civil right.  And it’s often lower-income neighborhoods that suffer the most from high crimes, while wealthier neighborhoods stay relatively safe.  In fact, Black and Hispanic Democrats are more likely than white Democrats to support increased spending on local police.  That’s according to a Pew survey from late last year.  Look, politicizing crime seeks to gain from other people’s pain, but trying to ignore crime for ideological reasons is both callous and clue less, and it’s sure to promote a political backlash.”

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): John Avlon - Commentary -New Day | Date: September 7, 2022 |  Duration: 00:00:44 | Photo/Video Credit: CNN

Biden’s Backdrop Was ‘Almost Satanic'

Raymond Arroyo: Can you remember an example of a prime time address via president so laced with ugly and divisive political rhetoric and a backdrop that looked like that?

Monica Crowley: First of all, yeah, the imagery there was almost satanic with that blood red lighting and the two marines behind him.  It was just insane.  This was a garbage speech by a garbage president and the fact he gave this disgusting, dangerous speech at independence hall is a sacrilege.  He deliberately used two phrases.  He talked about extremism because of the association with terrorists and terrorism.  He also spoke about MAGA forces as if 75 million Americans are part of some subterfuge guerrilla group.  But he deliberately used that kind of language because he is making no secret of his intention of turning half the country into enemies of the state.  The purpose of that is so that they can leverage the power of the state against us.  This is an incredibly dangerous moment for the country.  Every dictator throughout history has employed this kind of language with that kind of backdrop.  For most Americans, I think they’re really starting to see what is actually happening here which is that the most dangerous threat we face is that our own government has now been fully weaponized against us to the point were not only are the most fearsome agencies of the country turned against us from the DOJ, FBI, IRS.  Also the president of the United States who is suppose represent us all.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Raymond Arroyo, Monica Crowley - Interview The Ingraham Angle | Date: September 02, 2022 |  Duration: 00:01:48 | Photo/Video Credit: Snapshot of Video

Video: Why Would You Trust the FBI When It Comes to Trump?

Dan Bongino: “What I like about working here, is there’s a lot of different people with a lot of different opinions, even on the couch.  I disagree strongly with people at the network who want to default to trusting the FBI, because I ask a question, Brian, I ask — I'm not suggesting this is you, of course — but why would you trust the FBI when it comes to Trump?  Can you give me a reason, anyone?”

Brian Kilmeade: “None.”

Dan Bongino: “Where have they shown — OK, thank you.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Zero.”

Dan Bongino: “Where have they shown any documented history of unbiased, nonpartisan law-enforcement-type activity?  The answer is in no Trump case ever.  So your default defense of the FBI is outrageous.  Let me just give you a few — let’s go through the list.  And let me give you another argument.  So, first of all, we’ve got to trust the FBI. No, no, we don’t have to trust the FBI.  No, I don’t.  You want to trust the FBI?  Good luck.  You have no record to back that up, but you trust the FBI.  Then you say, well, it’s just a few bad apples.  Is it?  Let’s just go through a list of names of people who've been involved in either alleged corruption or documented corruption at the FBI.  We got Jim Comey, Andy McCabe, Bill Priestap — I had to write this down so I didn’t forget them all — Jim Baker, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Stephen Semi (ph), Joe Bianca (ph), Kevin Clinesmith, Brian Otten, Tim Tebow, and those are just the people you know about.  Some alleged, some documented, granted everybody is innocent until proven guilty, I accept that, but it’s not one bad apple, it’s a rotten orchard.  So in regard to the open here you have, when you said, listen the DOJ says we don’t need a special master to review this, just trust us, we will review it ourselves with the FBI.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Right.”

Dan Bongino: “You know what?  I’m going to take a hard pass on that because we trusted you in the past and you told us that it was a pee pee tape, Russian collusion, and a DNC hack, and you’ve backed up absolutely none of that.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Right.”

Dan Bongino: “So, I’m going to give them a big zero on the credibility scale.”

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Fox News | Author(s): Brian Kilmeade, Dan Bongino - Fox and Friends | Date: August 31, 2022 |  Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credit: arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com

Glenn Beck Believes America is Close To COMPLETE Collapse

Glenn Beck joined "Stu Does America" on Wednesday to shed light on how close the United States is to complete collapse.

• Attribution: Blaze Media | Author(s): Glen Beck - Blaze Media / Headline - Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Date: September 18, 2021 | Photo / Video Credits: Blaze Media

GOP Texas State Rep Introduces Bill to Audit 2020 Election Results in State's 13 Most Populous Counties

“We need a forensic audit to uncover all the voter fraud,” Toth said, according to a news release.

• Attribution: The Western Journal |  Author(s): Cameron Arcand | Date: July 20, 2021 | Photo Credits: Vimeo

Documentary Video: America Rewritten | Exclusive

The Constitution of the United States established the American form of government and radically changed the ideas of where the rights of citizens originate. It’s founded on the idea that the role of government is to protect God-given rights...

5-Star Josh digs deep, uses creditable historians, and articles to make his peer-reviewed point on how we are losing our way.  The documentary implied to myself that its not too late, its optimistic if we change our ways, cleverly saying it without saying it.  Well written! ~@Teapartier_Al on Twitter

• Attribution: Epoch TV - Crossroads | Author: @JoshJPhilipp on Twitter | Date: July 06, 2021 | Produced by: Katherine Lee

Video - Fitton on CSPAN: Adam Schiff Claims Congress Can Issue Secret Subpoenas against Americans!

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton appeared on CSPAN's "Washington Journal" to discuss Rep. Adam Schiff's potential violation of law and whether he abused his power to secretly subpoena and then publish the private phone records of innocent Americans.

• Attribution: CSPAN and Judical Watch | Author: CSPAN and Tom Fitton on Twitter | Date: June 25, 2021 |  Video Credits: CSPAN

Biden Administration to Begin Admitting Migrants Forced to Wait in Mexico.

Opinion: We had a 4.4% U-3 Unemployment rate prior to the very next month of a pandemic U-3 unemployment rate of 14.7% U-3 rate, then after 9 months the U-3 rate dropped to 6.7% while still in a pandemic, just before the next President took over.  Now one must ask themselves, with a around a 6.7% U-3 unemployment rate, NO ONE getting those $2000.00 checks that Joe Biden promised the masses, and a pandemic going on, yet we are allowing disease infested illegal aliens in the country again.  Sorry, this is not reform, this is called breaking a system that was working good.  This is only about trying to bring people in the USA that will vote Democrat and replace lower income jobs with slave labor.  Why else would you do this?  To destroy the USA?
By ~@Teapartier_Al on Twitter and @TeapartierAl on Parler | Feb. 17, 2021

• Credit: ABC 7 News 

How the media forgets, 50 years ago there were Armed Black Panthers in the Capitol.

Forgotten in today's world, but almost 53 years ago as of May 2, 1967, there was invasion on a State Capitol…

In May of this year, it will be the 53rd anniversary of the Black Panthers invading the state Capitol in San Francisco by at least two dozen gun- toting Black Panthers.  Where was the media on letting you know this happened?  Well, the media I think makes the younger generation and even some older people to believe that this has never happened before in our history.

A little history on the subject about the Black Panthers, they invaded a State Capitol and they were carrying rifles, pistols and shotguns, and were wearing dark glasses, leather jackets and berets, but they did not have Viking or Buffalo Headed people invading.  Anyhow, these guys marched up the front of the steps of Capital just to demonstrate their opposition to the anti-gun bill that Oakland Republican Don Mulford had wrote and sponsored.  Back in those days, there were no high-tech equipment to check people at the door, you came and left freely.  According to media reports back then, it caused Ronald Reagan and the NRA to back a gun-control bill too.  Imagine that…

There was a racial divide that existed 50 years ago.  The Black Panther Party formed a self defense organization, which began in 1966 as a small community organization across the bay in Oakland.  The founders of the Black Panthers were Huey Newton and Bobby Seale.

According to news reports, Seale described the Panthers as “an organization that represents black people and many white radicals relate to this and understand that the Black Panther Party is a righteous revolutionary front against this racist decadent, capitalistic system.”  The motto back then was “Power to the People.”

The Black Panthers even instituted armed “Patrols” to protect African Americans from Oakland police harassment.  California, in those days, it was legal to carry guns in public as long as the gun weren't pointed at someone.  Note how your rights have been taken away today?

The demonstration at the State Capital drew the attention of then FBI Director 'J. Edgar Hoover and FBI wanted to make sure “Black Nationalist hate groups” were scrutinized and put-on watch lists.

You might even be wondering what happened with the Black Panthers from their actions during those times?  It resulted extremely fast approval of Mulford’s bill.  Assemblyman Don Mulford even added a clause barring anyone, but law enforcement from bringing a loaded firearm into the Capitol.

But today, were are in different era in history, and during the last twelve years, we have a socialist fraction that has entered the Whitehouse in 2008 and really has not left our government, because lots of these people took upper-level jobs inside our government, and this is what President Trump has to deal with.

The leftist socialist/communist have been hard at work since then trying to divide We The People in this country.  Americans experienced a President from 2008-2016 that did everything under the power of his administration to divide America for eight years.  Even the President’s wife claimed she hated America.  We as a nation have never been as divided as we have been today, since the civil war.  Some folks as well as myself believe those times may be coming soon again, if we don't get this communist fraction out of the country.

Folks like myself have never experience this type behavior from the media nor from our politicians, maybe we should call it gas lighting, slanting or just plain lying their ass off to the public.  I in my lifetime, I really have seen nothing like it in my life.  What surprises me, even the courts did not want to get involve in the elections to check it to make sure there was no fraud, whereas in the year 2000, the courts were all over the election.  It’s like the media and politicians think us old bastards just died off or something.  Its like the media thinks no one knows or remembers any history about this country anymore.  It’s truly sad, I know that my Uncle and Dad, bless their souls, fought hard in World War II and the Korean War to keep this country free and safe.  I know both of them, would not only be totally disgusted with the Democrats and with Republicans too, because in the past, both parties have kept each other in check.

Politicians were told and warned that something like this could happen.  All this crap could have been avoided, if a full audit would have taken place immediately on the vote.  No one would have died, no one would be mad, friends may still be friends, and this country would be closer for it.

Our politicians need to remember they represent the people.  These politicians today seem like the only people they're serving are themselves.  Politicians are serving at the pleasure of the people and when you see such events at the Capitol, you know something is wrong.  I'll recite what a federal judge once said here in Seattle, "You don't see people throwing the kitchen sink against something, if there is nothing wrong."  Not sure if it was from a quote, but it definitely applies here.

Our politicians, not all them, but I would say more than a good percentage, higher than half, have ignored the citizens, who elect them.  These Politicians fail to hold town halls, refuse to listen to their constituents when writing them, and avoid taking there calls.  These politicians have no clue what is going on outside their bubbles in DC.

When the people need to come knocking and the politicians don't have a clue of why the people are there in the first place, well you know they're just insensitive jerks who ignore the voter, and go ahead with their own agenda, just like they did with electoral college vote, even after 6 states wanted their state's' ascertainment back.  Four people died that day at the Capitol and it was all ignored and put aside.  It's like it was scripted or something out of a movie.

These politicians are just looking to blame someone other than themselves.  I warned them all and so did others, did they listen?  NO!  May be this time the COCKROACHES will listen?  FOUR PEOPLE DIED and the today a fifth person died.  All the senseless deaths over something that could have been resolved with the Courts or the Legislative bodies.  DO YOU IDIOT POLITICIANS know why We The People showed up, because they no longer trust you!  SMDH. On Twitter: @Teapartier_Al - 01/08/2021

Updated: June 03, 2021, after an investigation, the claim of anyone being kill by protesters was nothing more than a made up senerio by the House of Representatives and the Media. One person died and her name was Ashli E. Babbitt, she was a Trump supporter who tried to enter the Capital building and was shot. According to the Capital police, she was shot by a Capital police officer.

• Credit: Peer Reviewed Politics™  by Teapartier_Al on Twitter