Opinion and Commentary Page


Video: Raskin Claims, ‘It’s A Remarkable Thing that Anybody Out There Believes that Donald Trump Won An Election and then claiming Trump had Lost By More Than 7 M Votes.’




Peer Reviewed Politics™ Opinion: Raskin is funny, not just funny looking either.  Jamie Raskin is either trying to be a convincing comedian or he is just down right lying his butt off, just like the rest of the clowns on the January 6th Committee.  How do we know this, well if you use a little logic here it will go a long way.  Lets examine Raskin claims for facts and since no one real knows what happen behind the doors of that November 2020 election, because there were many claims, there were audits, and their was fraud found, but Democrats and some RINO's' claimed there was not enough fraud to change the election.

With this all being said, if you really want to kind of know what happened, but not all the details with the lying, take a 30,000 foot view of the issue.  What I mean, take a look at Joe Biden, ask yourself of who he is, if he's liked and if he is competent.  President Joe Biden has been in politics for 47 years before being sworn in to serve as our 46th President.  You would hope Joe made some friends after 47 years in congress.  Friends of Joe, do like Joe Biden, but the people he knows also thought he shouldn't run for President, either.  Former President Obama was one of the people who thought President Biden should not run the country and Obama told President Joe Biden not to run for President in 2020.

The New York Times also reported, Obama quietly urged Biden not to run for President on August 16, 2019 and multiples times before that too. According to the Times article, the two men spoke at least a half dozen times before Mr. Biden decided to run, and Mr. Obama took pains to cast his doubts about the campaign in personal terms.  "You don’t have to do this, Joe, you really don’t," Mr. Obama told Mr. Biden earlier this year, according to a person familiar with the exchange.  Mr. Biden — who thinks he could have defeated Donald Trump four years ago—responded by telling Mr. Obama he could never forgive himself if he turned down a second shot at Mr. Trump.

According to other articles, the Times reported that in March 2019, Obama gathered Biden's top advisers, Anita Dunn and Kate Bedingfield to his Washington office.  Multiple sources confirmed to the Times that the ex-president had warned Biden's advisers to make sure that Biden doesn't "embarrass himself" or "damage his legacy."

Robert Gates, who was a former Defense Secretary of the United States wrote in his memoirs, "I think he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades,” Yet, Robert Gates did state he has respect for Joe's character and Gates stated in his memoirs that, "Joe Biden is impossible not to like," and Gates continued to say that Biden has, "been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.  See the video interview of Robert Gates below at timestamp 34:00 minutes.


Now supposedly, President Joe Biden was very popular among young Democrats, according to his administration and the media, supposedly this is how Joe won the presidency as Democrats have claimed, but if you went to anyone of Joe Biden rallies, hardly anyone ever went to any of one of his rallies, in fact even as a current president, very few people go to any of his events outside D.C.  When you go to a Trump rally, its standing room only and most of the time, there are thousands of people outside who can't get inside, because there are limits on how many can attend, even as a former president, he has the same sell out crowds everwhere Trump goes.  You can't even compare the two. 

In fact, a majority of people that Trump has endorsed, have won their primaries in 2022.  Does this sound like President Biden had more voters that voted for him than whom had voted for Former President Obama in the 2008 election, which had the record of 69,498,516 votes?  We don't think Biden beat Obamas record, there is no way President Joe Biden had 81,284,000 votes.  In fact, if Biden was so popular with the young, then you would expect to find on social media accounts that President Biden should have more followers than Former President Obama and Trump.

What you will find if you compare Joe Biden and Barack Obama on Twitter, there is again no comparison.  Obama's personal account there are more than a 133 million people who follow him on Twitter today.  Biden had about 20 million at the time of the election on his personal account, President Biden currently has roughly 25 million on the POTUS account and today, President Biden has about 35 million following his personal account.  Now if you compare the archived account of Trump just before he left the Whitehouse he had roughly 88 million people following his POTUS account, today this achieved account has still about 32.5 million following it.

Former President Trump's personal Twitter account was suspended, so we cant get the current numbers of followers for this account, but we did follow his personal twitter account up until it was suspend and Trump had roughly 88.5 million following his personal account of @realDonaldTrump at Twitter.  Currently President Trump is no longer on Twitter, but he does now have his own social media website called Truth Social, which was started in February of 2022.  Currently @realDonaldTrump has roughly 4.1 million users on his new site.  Former President Trump's' website is popular among conservatives and libertarians.

With this all being said, we know for a fact, that Joe Biden never got 81 million votes for President. We know that Trump or Barack Obama were way more likely to have this many votes or more, but not Joe Biden. In fact, President Joe Biden's numbers look completely fake, he is not that popular among registered Democrats, and social media shows he is not liked that much either.  If President Joe Biden had that many people who like him, he would have a lot more people showing up at his rallies.

In fact, we think if President Biden was giving away new cars at his next rally, Biden would not be able to fill a huge airport tarmac, large coliseum, not alone a small arena or building.  Sorry, but President Joe Biden is not that popular and thats why we and a lot of people believe Biden did not win the election November 2020.

  • Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Chris Hayes, Jamie Raskin - Interview - All In with Chris Hayes | Date: October 01, 2022 | Duration: 00:01:27 | Photo/Video Credit: MSNBC

Video: Fernand Amandi: ‘If the Republicans Capture Either Houses of Congress, They Are Committed to Undoing Democracy’




TRANSCRIPT:

Tiffany Cross: Yeah Brad, you made many good points but what is the prediction for that you’re the resident pollster here brad, his optimism is a warranted, do you see people turning out in Georgia and delivering a victory to abrams and warnock Florida, sherrod beasley, North Carolina all throughout the country, considering that most of these communities have to leapfrog over rampant voters to do that.  Your thoughts?

Fernand Amandi: I think that’s exactly right.  Number one, we have to be mindful that the Republicans are now all in a committed effort to make voting as difficult as possible, especially if you are someone from a person of color community that be taken in the mindset, I think Tiffany, yes, we will see record midterm turnout.  I think it will be equal, if not better than what we saw in 2018, the highest midterm turnout in the last 75 years.  I think we will see again, if we are able to capture and hold on to the Senate, and maybe even hold on to the house, it’s going to be because Black voters, Hispanic voters, Asian voters, all of the voters across the spectrum of this rising majority turned out.  The truth of the matter is, deafening, if they don’t take the opportunity to vote in this election, they may not have an opportunity to vote again in a free and fair election.  Those really are the stakes.  I don’t think any of us can stress enough, if the Republicans capture either houses of Congress, they are committed to undoing democracy, they are committed to over turning whatever electoral results, quote unquote, does not go their way in 2024.  You even have people like Marco Rubio right now saying they necessarily commit to accepting the result of the 2022 elections.  This is what is at stake, this is why I think we have to focus on this issue and how these communities, according to the polls, show they are very engaged, very enthused and they

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Opinion: First thing we would like to address with Mr. Fernand Amandi is his understanding of what type of country we have.

Mr. Fernand Amandi we would like to direct your attention to the Constitution of the United States, because it tells you what type of country we have, obviously you have not read the constitution, otherwise you wouldn't be calling it a Democracy.  We would like to direct your attention to what a democracy is and why the founders of this country avoided calling the USA a Democracy.  Lets see what some dictionaries say, but remember some of the online and newer dictionaries try to redefine a Democracy into different classes.  The founders did not define a democracy in classes, they only defined as being partial or pure and by all means, none of the founders where interested in a Democracy, thus we are a Republic.

Us older folks know what a Democracy is, so no one is fooling us, and it''s our job to let our children know what we are and where to look too.

Democracy: noun;

American Dictionary;

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT - A democracy is a country in which power is held by elected representatives.

The belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves
Definition of democracy from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge University Press;

The belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives, or directly by the people themselves:

  • The government has promised to uphold the principles of democracy.

  • The early 1990s saw the spread of democracy in Eastern Europe.

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Note: "A lot of the dictionaries recently have decided to changed their meaning of a democracy, so its sounds better and that it appears not to be part of communism. Don't be fooled, we are not a Democracy and never have been, otherwise the Constitution would indicate it."

Business English Dictionary;

POLITICS - The belief that everyone in a country has the right to express their opinions, and that power should be held by people who are elected, or a system of government based on this belief:
  • The country was celebrating its return to democracy.
POLITICS - A country in which power is held by people who are elected:
  • It is now a stable, well-governed democracy.
In Federalist 10, James Madison wrote about Democracies; "A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual."

"Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."

"Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions."

"A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.  Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union."

"The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are:
  • "First, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest;"
  • "Secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended."
"The effect of the first difference is, on the one hand, to refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations."  "Under such a regulation, it may well happen that the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves, convened for the purpose."  "On the other hand, the effect may be inverted."  "Men of factious tempers, of local prejudices, or of sinister designs, may, by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people."  "The question resulting is, whether small or extensive republics are more favorable to the election of proper guardians of the public weal; and it is clearly decided in favor of the latter by two obvious considerations:"
  • "In the first place, it is to be remarked that, however small the republic may be, the representatives must be raised to a certain number, in order to guard against the cabals of a few; and that, however large it may be, they must be limited to a certain number, in order to guard against the confusion of a multitude."  "Hence, the number of representatives in the two cases not being in proportion to that of the two constituents, and being proportionally greater in the small republic, it follows that, if the proportion of fit characters be not less in the large than in the small republic, the former will present a greater option, and consequently a greater probability of a fit choice."
  • "In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters."
"It must be confessed that in this, as in most other cases, there is a mean, on both sides of which inconveniences will be found to lie."  "By enlarging too much the number of electors, you render the representatives too little acquainted with all their local circumstances and lesser interests; as by reducing it too much, you render him unduly attached to these, and too little fit to comprehend and pursue great and national objects."  "The federal Constitution forms a happy combination in this respect; the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures."

"The other point of difference is, the greater number of citizens and extent of territory which may be brought within the compass of republican than of democratic government; and it is this circumstance principally which renders factious combinations less to be dreaded in the former than in the latter."  The smaller the society, the fewer probably will be the distinct parties and interests composing it; the fewer the distinct parties and interests, the more frequently will a majority be found of the same party; and the smaller the number of individuals composing a majority, and the smaller the compass within which they are placed, the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression."  "Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own strength, and to act in unison with each other."  "Besides other impediments, it may be remarked that, where there is a consciousness of unjust or dishonorable purposes, communication is always checked by distrust in proportion to the number whose concurrence is necessary."

  • Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV / Peer Reviewed Politics™ - Opinion | Author(s): Tiffany Cross, Fernand Amandi - Panel -  The Cross Connection with Tiffany Cross | Date: September 24, 2022 | Duration: 00:02:03 | Photo/Video Credit: MSNBC

Video: Mark Levin: People Holding the Levers of Power in Wash., D.C. Understand There’s a Difference Between McConnell and Trump, DeSantis




TRANSCRIPT:

Dan Bongino: You have written a number of transformative books that design the liberal movement.  I have a minute and a half.  Are you optimistic?  Can we turn this freedom train around and get it back to the station in.  Given the media is not telling the truth about where we are.  Are we condemned to failure here?  I’m genuinely concerned about that.

Mark Levin: I go back and forth.  We can’t win every election.  But we better start winning a slew of them or we are going to lose the country.  We need politicians hole focus on the culture and society.  That’s why Donald Trump was and is such a transformative individual.  That’s why Ron DeSantis is such a transformative individual.  And that’s why they are under vicious attack and assault.  The people entrenched.  The people who have all the resources and control the instrumentalities of our government, they understand the difference between a Mitch McConnell and the Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, and we have to, too, if we are going to keep our country.

Video: ‘Trying to Ignore Crime for Ideological Reasons Is Both Callous & Clueless’




AVLON: “When the state legislature finally acted on criminal justice this summer, they decided to focus on semantics instead of solutions, officially replacing the term ‘inmate’ with ‘incarcerated person’ in state laws.  Seriously, that’s what they did.  Now, sometimes we forget that public safety is a fundamental civil right.  And it’s often lower-income neighborhoods that suffer the most from high crimes, while wealthier neighborhoods stay relatively safe.  In fact, Black and Hispanic Democrats are more likely than white Democrats to support increased spending on local police.  That’s according to a Pew survey from late last year.  Look, politicizing crime seeks to gain from other people’s pain, but trying to ignore crime for ideological reasons is both callous and clueless, and it’s sure to promote a political backlash.”

  • Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): John Avlon - Commentary -New Day | Date: September 7, 2022 |  Duration: 00:00:44 | Photo/Video Credit: CNN

Video: Biden’s Backdrop Was ‘Almost Satanic’




Raymond Arroyo: Can you remember an example of a prime time address via president so laced with ugly and divisive political rhetoric and a backdrop that looked like that?

Monica Crowley: First of all, yeah, the imagery there was almost satanic with that blood red lighting and the two marines behind him.  It was just insane.  This was a garbage speech by a garbage president and the fact he gave this disgusting, dangerous speech at independence hall is a sacrilege.  He deliberately used two phrases.  He talked about extremism because of the association with terrorists and terrorism.  He also spoke about MAGA forces as if 75 million Americans are part of some subterfuge guerrilla group.  But he deliberately used that kind of language because he is making no secret of his intention of turning half the country into enemies of the state.  The purpose of that is so that they can leverage the power of the state against us.  This is an incredibly dangerous moment for the country.  Every dictator throughout history has employed this kind of language with that kind of backdrop.  For most Americans, I think they’re really starting to see what is actually happening here which is that the most dangerous threat we face is that our own government has now been fully weaponized against us to the point were not only are the most fearsome agencies of the country turned against us from the DOJ, FBI, IRS.  Also the president of the United States who who is suppose represent us all.

  • Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Raymond Arroyo, Monica Crowley - Interview The Ingraham Angle | Date: September 02, 2022 |  Duration: 00:01:48 | Photo/Video Credit: Fox News Channel (FNC)

Video: Why Would You Trust the FBI When It Comes to Trump?




Dan Bongino: “What I like about working here, is there’s a lot of different people with a lot of different opinions, even on the couch.  I disagree strongly with people at the network who want to default to trusting the FBI, because I ask a question, Brian, I ask — I’m not suggesting this is you, of course — but why would you trust the FBI when it comes to Trump?  Can you give me a reason, anyone?”

Brian Kilmeade: “None.”

Dan Bongino: “Where have they shown — OK, thank you.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Zero.”

Dan Bongino: “Where have they shown any documented history of unbiased, nonpartisan law-enforcement-type activity?  The answer is in no Trump case ever.  So your default defense of the FBI is outrageous.  Let me just give you a few — let’s go through the list.  And let me give you another argument.  So, first of all, we’ve got to trust the FBI. No, no, we don’t have to trust the FBI.  No, I don’t.  You want to trust the FBI?  Good luck.  You have no record to back that up, but you trust the FBI.  Then you say, well, it’s just a few bad apples.  Is it?  Let’s just go through a list of names of people who’ve been involved in either alleged corruption or documented corruption at the FBI.  We got Jim Comey, Andy McCabe, Bill Priestap — I had to write this down so I didn’t forget them all — Jim Baker, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Stephen Semi (ph), Joe Bianca (ph), Kevin Clinesmith, Brian Otten, Tim Tebow, and those are just the people you know about.  Some alleged, some documented, granted everybody is innocent until proven guilty, I accept that, but it’s not one bad apple, it’s a rotten orchard.  So in regard to the open here you have, when you said, listen the DOJ says we don’t need a special master to review this, just trust us, we will review it ourselves with the FBI.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Right.”

Dan Bongino: “You know what?  I’m going to take a hard pass on that because we trusted you in the past and you told us that it was a pee pee tape, Russian collusion, and a DNC hack, and you’ve backed up absolutely none of that.”

Brian Kilmeade: “Right.”

Dan Bongino: “So, I’m going to give them a big zero on the credibility scale.”

Glenn Beck Believes America is Close To COMPLETE Collapse

Glenn Beck joined "Stu Does America" on Wednesday to shed light on how close the United States is to complete collapse.

  • Attribution: Blaze Media | Author(s): Glen Beck - Blaze Media / Headline - Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Date: September 18, 2021 | Photo / Video Credits: Blaze Media

Video Biden: Today, I Am Calling on Private Sector Companies to Impose Vaccine Mandates

Peer Reviewed Politics™ Commentary: No Beijing Biden, you don't have that right to ask private sector companies to do your dirty work.  Employees do not have to share the PHI with anyone, because it's the law Joe.

Do you and Psaki have a problems with the laws of this country?  President Beijing, Psaki and the Beijing Administration don't have a right to dictate to people how to live.  This is the USA, not China.  Our suggestion, instead of working on something the court told your administration you don't have a right to do or ask others to do for your administration, you should be working on getting out those Americans and SVI's' out of Afghanistan or those in congress should work to remove you, as you have become a national security risk!.

If you don't think you have not become a risk, then read up, this was wrote after our article.  Please step down and resign for your country's sake. ~ @Teapartier_Al on Twitter

  • Attribution:  | Author(s): Peer Reviewed Politics™ / Jack Davis - The Western Journal / Katy Tur Reports - MSNBC | Date: August 23, 2021 | Photo / Video Credits: MSNBC

GOP Texas State Rep Introduces Bill to Audit 2020 Election Results in State's 13 Most Populous Counties

“We need a forensic audit to uncover all the voter fraud,” Toth said, according to a news release.

  • Attribution: The Western Journal |  Author(s): Cameron Arcand | Date: July 20, 2021 | Photo Credits: Vimeo

Documentary Video: America Rewritten | Exclusive

The Constitution of the United States established the American form of government and radically changed the ideas of where the rights of citizens originate. It’s founded on the idea that the role of government is to protect God-given rights...

5-Star Josh digs deep, uses creditable historians, and articles to make his peer-reviewed point on how we are losing our way.  The documentary implied to myself that its not too late, its optimistic if we change our ways, cleverly saying it without saying it.  Well written! ~@Teapartier_Al on Twitter

  • Attribution: Epoch TV - Crossroads | Author: @JoshJPhilipp on Twitter | Date: July 06, 2021 | Produced by: Katherine Lee

Video: A Comparison of Apples to Oranges

Biden’s Border Crisis Management vs. Bush’s Hurricane Katrina Crisis Management.

Video - Fitton on CSPAN: Adam Schiff Claims Congress Can Issue Secret Subpoenas against Americans!

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton appeared on CSPAN's "Washington Journal" to discuss Rep. Adam Schiff's potential violation of law and whether he abused his power to secretly subpoena and then publish the private phone records of innocent Americans.

  • Attribution: CSPAN and Judical Watch | Author: CSPAN and Tom Fitton on Twitter | Date: June 25, 2021 |  Video Credits: CSPAN

Biden Administration to Begin Admitting Migrants Forced to Wait in Mexico.

Opinion: We had a 4.4% U-3 Unemployment rate prior to the very next month of a pandemic U-3 unemployment rate of 14.7% U-3 rate, then after 9 months the U-3 rate dropped to 6.7% while still in a pandemic, just before the next President took over.  Now one must ask themselves, with a around a 6.7% U-3 unemployment rate, NO ONE getting those $2000.00 checks that Joe Biden promised the masses, and a pandemic going on, yet we are allowing disease infested illegal aliens in the country again.  Sorry, this is not reform, this is called breaking a system that was working good.  This is only about trying to bring people in the USA that will vote Democrat and replace lower income jobs with slave labor.  Why else would you do this?  To destroy the USA?
By ~@Teapartier_Al on Twitter and @TeapartierAl on Parler | Feb. 17, 2021

How the media forgets, 50 years ago there were Armed Black Panthers in the Capitol.

Forgotten in today's world, but almost 53 years ago as of May 2, 1967, there was invasion on a State Capitol…

In May of this year, it will be the 53rd anniversary of the Black Panthers invading the state Capitol in San Francisco by at least two dozen gun- toting Black Panthers.  Where was the media on letting you know this happened?  Well, the media I think makes the younger generation and even some older people to believe that this has never happened before in our history.

A little history on the subject about the Black Panthers, they invaded a State Capitol and they were carrying rifles, pistols and shotguns, and were wearing dark glasses, leather jackets and berets, but they did not have Viking or Buffalo Headed people invading.  Anyhow, these guys marched up the front of the steps of Capital just to demonstrate their opposition to the anti-gun bill that Oakland Republican Don Mulford had wrote and sponsored.  Back in those days, there were no high-tech equipment to check people at the door, you came and left freely.  According to media reports back then, it caused Ronald Reagan and the NRA to back a gun-control bill too.  Imagine that…

There was a racial divide that existed 50 years ago.  The Black Panther Party formed a self defense organization, which began in 1966 as a small community organization across the bay in Oakland.  The founders of the Black Panthers were Huey Newton and Bobby Seale.

According to news reports, Seale described the Panthers as “an organization that represents black people and many white radicals relate to this and understand that the Black Panther Party is a righteous revolutionary front against this racist decadent, capitalistic system.”  The motto back then was “Power to the People.”

The Black Panthers even instituted armed “Patrols” to protect African Americans from Oakland police harassment.  California, in those days, it was legal to carry guns in public as long as the gun weren't pointed at someone.  Note how your rights have been taken away today?

The demonstration at the State Capital drew the attention of then FBI Director 'J. Edgar Hoover and FBI wanted to make sure “Black Nationalist hate groups” were scrutinized and put-on watch lists.

You might even be wondering what happened with the Black Panthers from their actions during those times?  It resulted extremely fast approval of Mulford’s bill.  Assemblyman Don Mulford even added a clause barring anyone, but law enforcement from bringing a loaded firearm into the Capitol.

But today, were are in different era in history, and during the last twelve years, we have a socialist fraction that has entered the Whitehouse in 2008 and really has not left our government, because lots of these people took upper-level jobs inside our government, and this is what President Trump has to deal with.

The leftist socialist/communist have been hard at work since then trying to divide We The People in this country.  Americans experienced a President from 2008-2016 that did everything under the power of his administration to divide America for eight years.  Even the President’s wife claimed she hated America.  We as a nation have never been as divided as we have been today, since the civil war.  Some folks as well as myself believe those times may be coming soon again, if we don't get this communist fraction out of the country.

Folks like myself have never experience this type behavior from the media nor from our politicians, maybe we should call it gas lighting, slanting or just plain lying their ass off to the public.  I in my lifetime, I really have seen nothing like it in my life.  What surprises me, even the courts did not want to get involve in the elections to check it to make sure there was no fraud, whereas in the year 2000, the courts were all over the election.  It’s like the media and politicians think us old bastards just died off or something.  Its like the media thinks no one knows or remembers any history about this country anymore.  It’s truly sad, I know that my Uncle and Dad, bless their souls, fought hard in World War II and the Korean War to keep this country free and safe.  I know both of them, would not only be totally disgusted with the Democrats and with Republicans too, because in the past, both parties have kept each other in check.

Politicians were told and warned that something like this could happen.  All this crap could have been avoided, if a full audit would have taken place immediately on the vote.  No one would have died, no one would be mad, friends may still be friends, and this country would be closer for it.

Our politicians need to remember they represent the people.  These politicians today seem like the only people they're serving are themselves.  Politicians are serving at the pleasure of the people and when you see such events at the Capitol, you know something is wrong.  I'll recite what a federal judge once said here in Seattle, "You don't see people throwing the kitchen sink against something, if there is nothing wrong."  Not sure if it was from a quote, but it definitely applies here.

Our politicians, not all them, but I would say more than a good percentage, higher than half, have ignored the citizens, who elect them.  These Politicians fail to hold town halls, refuse to listen to their constituents when writing them, and avoid taking there calls.  These politicians have no clue what is going on outside their bubbles in DC.

When the people need to come knocking and the politicians don't have a clue of why the people are there in the first place, well you know they're just insensitive jerks who ignore the voter, and go ahead with their own agenda, just like they did with electoral college vote, even after 6 states wanted their state's' ascertainment back.  Four people died that day at the Capitol and it was all ignored and put aside.  It's like it was scripted or something out of a movie.

These politicians are just looking to blame someone other than themselves.  I warned them all and so did others, did they listen?  NO!  May be this time the COCKROACHES will listen?  FOUR PEOPLE DIED and the today a fifth person died.  All the senseless deaths over something that could have been resolved with the Courts or the Legislative bodies.  DO YOU IDIOT POLITICIANS know why We The People showed up, because they no longer trust you!  SMDH. On Twitter: @Teapartier_Al - 01/08/2021

Updated: June 03, 2021, after an investigation, the claim of anyone being kill by protesters was nothing more than a made up senerio by the House of Representatives and the Media. One person died and her name was Ashli E. Babbitt, she was a Trump supporter who tried to enter the Capital building and was shot. According to the Capital police, she was shot by a Capital police officer.

  • Credit: Peer Reviewed Politics™  by Teapartier_Al on Twitter